Cheng, M Y; Chang, Y H and Korir, D (2019) Novel approach to estimating schedule to completion in construction projects using sequence and nonsequence learning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(11): 04019072, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Estimate schedule to completion (ESTC) is a difficult variable to determine accurately during the various phases of construction projects due to the complex, uncertain, and limited nature of currently available information. Currently, most construction managers estimate this variable using their subjective prior experience with budget planning. However, this method is costly and highly prone to inaccuracy. The study developed a novel inference model, the neural network-long short-term memory (NN-LSTM) model, to estimate ESTC accurately by factoring in the sequence and nonsequence factors that significantly influence project duration and that capture the inherent uncertainties in the construction field. NN-LSTM fuses two characteristics of artificial neural networks (ANNs): feedforward neural networks (FNNs) for nonsequential issue, and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for sequential issue. After a systematic review of the literature, brainstorming, and in-depth interviews with domain experts, a database of 226 historical cases collected from 11 construction projects with 14 influencing factors was created for learning purposes, with 10-fold cross validation used to partition the training and testing data sets. NN-LSTM was then applied to estimate the schedule to completion for the historical cases, with FNN capturing the impact of time-independent factors on project duration and LSTM capturing the long temporal dependency for sequential inputs. The learning results indicated good performance, with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of less than 5% and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2%, proving the NN-LSTM model to be more reliable than the currently prevailing earned value management (EVM) formulas. Moreover, in subsequent comparison testing NN-LSTM proved to be superior to other artificial intelligence (AI) prediction models. The model has the ability to generate reliable scheduling estimates for project managers in order to facilitate their accurate planning and the monitoring of the time performance of projects, allowing timely action to be taken to remedy foreseen delays and facilitating informed decision-making.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | inference model; neural network-long short-term memory; schedule estimate; time-independent and time-dependent factors |
| Index terms: | estimating, interview, influencing factor, construction project, feedforward, time performance, monitoring, earned value management, duration, prediction model, systematic literature review, database, project manager, decision-making, scheduling, artificial intelligence, testing, neural network, validation, construction manager, estimate, artificial neural network |
| Subjects: | production management, operations research, research evaluation and metrics, decision analysis, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, project controls, artificial intelligence, control systems, data management, risk assessment, professional development, modelling and simulation, data collection methods, profession, professional practice |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Time Control, Risk Management, Information Management, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Project Management, Site Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here