Sustainability of column-supported RC slabs: Fiber reinforcement as an alternative

De La Fuente, A; Casanovas-Rubio, M D M; Pons, O and Armengou, J (2019) Sustainability of column-supported RC slabs: Fiber reinforcement as an alternative. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(7): 04019042, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced concrete has been used in structures without any additional reinforcement when the design is determined by transient load stages (precast segments for tunnels), in elements with favorable boundary conditions, and in structures subjected to low load levels (pavements or pipes). Recently, the material has been used as the primary reinforcement in elements with greater structural responsibility, such as building column-supported slabs. Several dozen buildings have incorporated this new technology, and research is being conducted on how to optimize the design while guaranteeing the required reliability levels. However, in some cases, fibers have not been used as the primary reinforcement in concrete slabs for economic reasons. In most cases, the solution is compared with existing alternatives (traditionally reinforced concrete) considering only the direct material costs and disregarding indirect costs, social aspects, and environmental factors. The building construction sector lacks sustainability rating tools to assess structural components separately (e.g., columns, floors, panels, and façades). This paper presents a new method that can be used to assess the sustainability of concrete slabs by means of a multicriteria decision-making approach including fiber-reinforced concrete. It used rigorous analyses of current concrete slab technologies and sustainability assessment tools. Criteria, indicators, weights, and value functions were specifically selected, defined, and calibrated for this research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building; environment; integrated value model for sustainability assessment; slabs; steel fiber-reinforced concrete; sustainability
Index terms: reinforcement, fibre reinforcement, indirect cost, new technology, boundary condition, reinforced concrete, decision-making, social aspect, fibre-reinforced concrete, environmental factor, tunnel, sustainability assessment, column, building construction
Subjects: building materials, environmental science, innovation and technology management, traditional and composite building materials, structural engineering, sustainability assessment, decision analysis, sociology, building construction, cost management, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here