Franco-Duran, D M and Garza, J M D L (2019) Review of resource-constrained scheduling algorithms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(11): 03119006, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
On a regular basis, project managers concentrate their efforts on critical and near-critical activities. However, the concepts of total float and critical path lose their significance after applying resource-constrained scheduling (RCS) techniques. RCS techniques mitigate the resource supply-demand problem but break the critical path. As a result, several algorithms have been developed to identify a continuous critical path in resource-constrained schedules. This study reviews and evaluates the performance of eight RCS-related algorithms with the purpose of identifying the shortcomings that must be addressed so they can be applied for delay analysis. The review shows that a systematic procedure is needed to (1) incorporate and handle dynamic resource links when the schedule is updated, and (2) select a potential resource links configuration. Addressing these limitations will make the algorithms more practical for real construction and engineering projects and will allow a more realistic delay analysis since schedules will reflect the real conditions of the project (resource loaded). This study (1) discusses potential solutions to the shortcomings of the existing algorithms, (2) provides recommendations on the methods that can be used by industry professionals, and (3) proposes a system to facilitate the selection of an algorithm based on the common features (heuristic), constraints (removal of logic links), and project characteristics (resources and calendars).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | critical path; delay analysis; phantom float; resource relationships; resource-constrained schedules |
| Index terms: | configuration, delay analysis, scheduling, critical path, project manager, heuristic |
| Subjects: | profession, risk assessment, operations research, systems engineering, project controls |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here