Legitimizing involvement in emergency accommodations: Water and wastewater utility perspectives

Hacker, M E; Kaminsky, J and Faust, K M (2019) Legitimizing involvement in emergency accommodations: Water and wastewater utility perspectives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(4): 04019013, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In 2015, 28 European countries cumulatively received over two million applications for asylum, almost three times more than in the previous year. This resulted in pre-existing accommodation facilities reaching capacity and requiring the provision of urban emergency accommodations in unconventional buildings. To meet this housing need, ad hoc task forces across multiple disciplines formed to mitigate the extreme uncertainty of providing infrastructure services in a short period of time. The involvement of water and wastewater utilities in this technical project was explored through employee perspectives from two German water and wastewater utilities using qualitative analysis techniques. Ethnographic interviews were iteratively coded for excerpts legitimizing the interviewee's involvement in providing water or wastewater services for emergency accommodations. Results show three emergent themes from utility employees: the necessity of improvisation during the design process, confidence in the situational response by individuals and the utility, and the necessity for improved coordination with other actors in the synthetic organization. In addition, this work provides a theoretical framework for the technical application of organizational legitimacy theory in the circumstances of extreme contextual uncertainty. Practical implications of this work suggest utility monitoring of emergency accommodations for improved design and better protocols for coordinating with other actors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: emergency housing; legitimacy; refugee; utility; wastewater; water
Index terms: utilities, coordination, monitoring, refugee, interview, design process, housing, legitimacy, housing need, qualitative analysis
Subjects: management, demography, housing and residential development, sociology, control systems, design methods, construction type, data collection methods, research design and methodology
Topics: Site Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here