Hamzeh, F R; El Samad, G and Emdanat, S (2019) Advanced metrics for construction planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(11): 04019063, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Production planning and control are critical in guiding projects toward meeting their targets. This paper uses the power of the last planner system (LPS) combined with conventional methods to assess schedule performance. Although previous studies have proposed multiple metrics within LPS, research correlating these various metrics to overall schedule performance has been both challenging and time-consuming. This study proposes new metrics and details a calculation method to measure significant aspects of planning performance that are not yet supported by a measurement metric. Moreover, the paper introduces a framework and a dashboard to employ these metrics to guide project-level and production planning. Results from applying the proposed framework to two construction projects in the United States show that projects tend to run behind the scheduled milestones due to poor performance in (1) making tasks ready and removing constraints, (2) committing to critical tasks, and (3) matching load to capacity. Findings underline major issues in construction planning where teams constantly struggle with aligning near-term planning with long-term planning. The proposed metrics can provide a proactive detection of issues and constant visibility of project status so that planning teams can apply earlier control measures to improve reliable planning and reduce milestone delays.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction planning; last planner system; metrics; production planning and control; project performance |
| Index terms: | project performance, construction planning, dashboard, construction project, last planner system, United States, schedule performance, production planning |
| Subjects: | construction planning, project delivery, data science, project controls, project management theory and practice, Geography, production management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Time Control, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here