Identification of social sustainability criteria in building energy retrofit projects

Jafari, A; Valentin, V and Bogus, S M (2019) Identification of social sustainability criteria in building energy retrofit projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(2): 04018136, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Building energy retrofits aim to reduce the energy consumption of existing facilities. The most significant impact of any energy retrofit project is during the operation phase of a building, when a building's users are directly impacted. This study focuses on the building operation phase by evaluating the social dimension of sustainability in energy retrofit projects. This study aimed to identify, categorize, and organize the social sustainability criteria of energy retrofit projects in existing buildings. A three-stage methodology was used that selected qualified experts in the targeted population, employed a Delphi technique to identify criteria for measuring social sustainability in energy retrofit projects, and used concept mapping to organize the identified social criteria. The study identified 19 social sustainability criteria that can be categorized in six clusters: occupants' health and comfort impact, society enhancement, cultural and community education, project stakeholder enhancement, building quality and technology enhancement, and socioeconomic growth. An empirical framework was developed for considering the impact level of social sustainability criteria in energy retrofit projects, including three levels: building, community, and society. The proposed framework can be used by practitioners who seek to consider or evaluate the social impacts of energy retrofits as well as policy makers who investigate the social aspects or social costs of energy reduction programs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concept mapping; Delphi; energy retrofits; social sustainability; sustainable development
Index terms: practitioner, operation phase, project stakeholder, Delphi technique, population, program, methodology, social aspect, concept mapping, building operation, society, energy reduction, sustainable development, comfort, energy consumption, social sustainability, social impact, dimension
Subjects: data collection methods, practitioner, energy systems, project delivery, health monitoring assessment and metrics, management, software systems, research methods, health safety and environment, demography, occupational health and safety management, decision analysis, sociology, communities and social development
Topics: Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here