Jin, R and Chen, Q (2019) Overview of concrete recycling legislation and practice in the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(4): 05019004, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Recycling concrete waste helps reduce the negative environmental impacts of construction activities. Worldwide, concrete recycling rates and available applications for recycled concrete vary widely. A deep understanding of the current status of concrete recycling in individual countries or regions would allow development of applicable and effective strategies for improvement. This empirical research on concrete recycling in the United States consists of two parts: a qualitative study of the legislation, regulation, and practice of solid waste management (SWM) and concrete recycling in 45 states and the District of Columbia, and a questionnaire survey of practitioners' views of concrete recycling in Ohio and California. Based on the qualitative analysis, the studied states and district were grouped into three categories, representing advanced, average, and below-average SWM practices, with the majority of states having average to below-average practice and so being in need of improvement. The survey results showed that practitioners in the two selected states have positive, consistent perceptions of the practice and benefits of and recommended methods for concrete recycling and identified no major difficulties except for a lack of government awareness and support. This research not only provides an updated understanding of concrete recycling legislation and practice but also offers useful strategies for government and industry to work together to promote concrete recycling.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concrete recycling; questionnaire survey; solid waste management; sustainability; United States |
| Index terms: | qualitative analysis, environmental impact, questionnaire, practitioner, regulation, survey, strategy, legislation, United States, solid waste management, qualitative study, construction activity, recycling |
| Subjects: | research design and methodology, data collection methods, practitioner, waste management, environmental impact, construction operations, legal systems, management, Geography, political science |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Site Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Governance, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here