Bilevel standards-compliant platform for evaluating building contractor safety

Khalafallah, A; Kartam, N and Razeq, R A (2019) Bilevel standards-compliant platform for evaluating building contractor safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(10): 4019054, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In building construction, contractors are typically selected through competitive bidding or negotiated contracting, in which the project price is the major selection criterion. A contractor's safety performance is still not a major selection criterion, despite the existence of numerous safety prequalification methods. The negative repercussions of such apathy create a critical need for systems that enable owners to evaluate contractor safety performance and facilitate the selection of safety-conscious contractors by virtue of their good safety practices. This study presents the development of a computerized platform for evaluating contractor safety performance that is capable of analyzing contractors' safety performance data. The platform incorporates newly developed parameters that enable (1) including leading and lagging safety indicators that depict current and past contractor safety performance; (2) conducting analysis on both the organizational and project levels; and (3) satisfying the requirements of international safety standards. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by presenting a validated standard-compliant set of 10 indicators and 71 metrics that facilitate evaluating contractor safety performance and establishing their significance analytically. This should prove useful to decision makers and researchers alike and is a step forward to facilitate including contractor safety performance among major selection criteria, which can ultimately bring significant improvements to the building industry's safety.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety; contractor selection; decision support system; relational database; safety evaluation
Index terms: construction safety, body of knowledge, safety standards, safety performance, building construction, competitive bidding, decision support, relational database, selection criteria, building industry, owner, contractor selection, platform, building contractor
Subjects: practitioner, bidding, knowledge management, digital design, tendering, environmental health, industry analysis, building construction, sociology, decision analysis, data management, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Procurement, Health and Safety, Information Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here