Li, H; Wang, M and Dong, X (2019) Resource leveling in projects with stochastic minimum time lags. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(4): 04019015, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In project management, resources and time are two critical aspects influencing the success of a project. On the one hand, resource leveling, an effective resource optimization technique, is widely adopted to guarantee the efficient use of resources. On the other hand, to deliver a project as soon as possible, it can typically be accelerated by overlapping some activities. In a real-life project environment, uncertainty is inevitable and further complicates resource leveling and activity overlapping. However, existing research tends to study resource leveling and activity overlapping separately and little attention has been paid to level resource usage with uncertain activity overlapping. Therefore, the authors model activity overlaps as minimum time lags and study the resource leveling problem with stochastic minimum time lags (RLP-SMTL), where both the time lags and the activity durations are uncertain. This study aims to obtain a scheduling strategy such that the usage of renewable resources is as smooth as possible over time. The tuple represented by a random key vector, a strategy dynamically schedules activities at each decision point. A simulation-based solution framework for the RLP-SMTL is proposed. Built upon the proposed solution framework, two metaheuristics, an evolutionary algorithm (EA) and a bat algorithm (BA), are designed. Based on 1,080 randomly generated 100-activity instances, extensive computational experiments are performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. The results reveal that the EA outperforms the BA in terms of both the objective function's value and the timely project completion probability. Although the strategies generated by the BA are slightly weaker than the EA, the BA is much faster than the EA. The results obtained by an additional comparison experiment further show that the proposed algorithms outperform the existing best-performing metaheuristic. Additionally, an example project is adopted to illustrate how the proposed approach can be applied to practical resource leveling in construction projects. In conclusion, this paper contributes to the body of knowledge in construction engineering and management by developing effective metaheuristics that equip the project manager with an automated tool to make effective resource leveling decisions under uncertainties.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | metaheuristics; project management; project scheduling; resource leveling; scheduling strategies; time uncertainty |
| Index terms: | strategy, construction engineering, project management, project scheduling, guarantee, renewable resources, project manager, resource levelling, resource optimization, scheduling, duration, effectiveness, experiment, evolutionary algorithm, construction project, body of knowledge |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, profession, project controls, algorithms, knowledge management, project management theory and practice, engineering methods, production management, resource management, environmental resource management, management, performance management, control systems, operations research, contract structure |
| Topics: | Procurement, Time Control, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Site Management, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here