Joint-venture contractor selection using competitive and collaborative criteria with uncertainty

Liang, R; Zhang, J; Wu, C; Sheng, Z and Wang, X (2019) Joint-venture contractor selection using competitive and collaborative criteria with uncertainty. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(2): 04018123, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate joint venture contractor (JVC) is paramount to the success of large-scale infrastructure projects. The purpose of this paper is to develop a unified approach for JVC selection. The proposed approach integrates competitive information and collaborative information, focusing on the hesitant fuzzy variables of the bid evaluators. An optimization model is established based on the maximizing deviation (MD) principle to determine the criterion weights objectively. Then, the weights of the bid evaluators are obtained through calculating the relative closeness coefficients of each bid evaluator and the group from the JVCs to the fuzzy positive-ideal solution (FPIS). All the potential JVCs are ranked through minimizing the deviation model based on the fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) approach. A case study of the JVC selection process for the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge (a large-scale island and tunnel engineering project) was conducted to illustrate the proposed approach. The results showed that, compared with the existing methods, the proposed method can select the contractors with good collaborative performance. This is important for the practice, because collaborative criteria are reflected in the key criteria currently used in JVC evaluation and selection. The findings from this study can help the JVC manager to identify a JVC with good collaborative performance and control the project risk from the initial stage.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: infrastructure projects; joint venture contractor; multiple-criteria decision making; uncertainty
Index terms: Hong Kong, contractor selection, case study, joint venture, deviation, topsis, infrastructure project, manager, tunnel, Macau, decision-making, preference
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, business, financial and cost management, Geography, tendering, decision-making and reasoning, infrastructure and transport systems, decision-making and optimization, decision analysis
Topics: Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here