Impact of activity sequencing on reducing variability

Lindhard, S M; Hamzeh, F; Gonzalez, V A; Wandahl, S and Ussing, L F (2019) Impact of activity sequencing on reducing variability. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(3): 04019001, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Variation in production is a major cause of producing waste in onsite construction operations, resulting in a workflow that is full of delays and interruptions. To reduce the negative impact of waste in construction, production managers need to address the causes of the variation that results in such waste. This paper explains the way to reduce the effects of variation in construction by changing the task sequence arrangement. The study analyzed the effect of some different task sequence arrangements on the production gap, crew waiting time, and production delay by simulating a group of work tasks and changing the task sequence arrangement from linear to parallel. Accordingly, 100 work activities were simulated in 98 different sequence designs, using a stochastic discrete-event simulation model, during which the number of parallel activities was systematically increased. The main finding from the studied configuration is that arranging tasks in parallel increases waste, whereas it reduces project duration. Moreover, waste resulting from variation was found to be an additional cause of waste when accelerating the production. Finally, it was revealed that the impact of variation on the task sequence highly depends on how often the schedule is updated. This study helps production managers to better understand of how the task sequence arrangement affects production performance in onsite construction operations.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: duration, construction operation, variability, configuration, workflow, manager, variation, onsite
Subjects: construction operations, systems engineering, project controls, building construction, management, practitioner, statistical analysis, contractual condition
Topics: Time Control, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Site Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Contract Administration, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here