Talking safety: Health and safety communication and safety climate in subcontracted construction workgroups

Lingard, H; Pirzadeh, P and Oswald, D (2019) Talking safety: Health and safety communication and safety climate in subcontracted construction workgroups. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(5): 04019029, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The practice of subcontracting out construction work has been identified as a contributing factor in poor work health and safety (WHS) performance. Relatively few studies have considered the processes through which safety climates develop within subcontracted workgroups. This study sought to examine the relationship between intragroup communication relating to WHS and the workgroup safety climate. Data were collected from 39 subcontracted workgroups in the Australian construction industry using social network analysis to examine worker-to-worker, supervisor-to-worker, and worker-to-supervisor patterns of WHS-related communication. The relationship between group social network metrics and group safety climate were examined. Network density was a predictor of the workgroup safety climate. Furthermore, a suppressor effect was found such that WHS-related communication between group members and the group supervisor increased the variance in group safety climate explained in a regression model. The results highlight the importance of intragroup communication in creating a shared understanding about the priority placed on WHS within subcontracted construction workgroups. In using subcontracted workgroups as the unit of analysis and linking within-group communication patterns to the workgroup safety climate, the research makes an original contribution to knowledge in empirically demonstrating the safety benefits associated with fostering a dense communication network and encouraging frequent supervisor-worker communication in subcontracted workgroups.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: communication network, safety climate, health and safety, social network, social network analysis, regression model, variance, density, subcontracting, construction work, supervisor, construction industry
Subjects: health safety and environment, research methods, industry analysis, statistical analysis, networking, sociology, measurement and scaling, practitioner, organization, analytical methods, operations management
Topics: Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here