Supplier performance evaluation in construction projects: Challenges and possible solutions

Noorizadeh, A; Peltokorpi, A and Avkiran, N K (2019) Supplier performance evaluation in construction projects: Challenges and possible solutions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(4): 04019007, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Supplier performance analysis can enlighten a construction company about improvement possibilities for better project outcomes. However, for systematic evaluation of a supplier across projects, changing the operating environment between projects should be addressed. Therefore, we first elaborate how supplier evaluation is challenged due to differences between projects in three characteristic groups: project product and location characteristics, project organization characteristics, and buyer-supplier transaction characteristics. We next discuss the possibility of applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) for supplier evaluation in construction, and argue how changing the operating environment can lead to nonhomogenous decision-making units in DEA. Building on these, we propose the process for supplier evaluation in the presence of a changing operating environment and different input-output profiles. Characteristics of 12 projects and supplier evaluations in 44 projects are used to illustrate evaluation challenges. The research extends current knowledge on supplier evaluation in construction by underlining how changing the operating environment across projects challenges systematic performance evaluation and by suggesting the process which further research could develop toward practical applications.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: changing operating environment; construction projects; data envelopment analysis; nonhomogenous decision-making units; supplier evaluation
Index terms: decision-making, construction project, supplier evaluation, performance evaluation, construction company, project organization, performance analysis, presence, data envelopment analysis, project outcome
Subjects: environmental science, data analysis and analytics, organization, project completion, decision analysis, production management, organizational theory, performance measurement, performance management
Topics: Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here