Quantifying the similarity between different project types based on their pay item compositions: Application to bundling

Qiao, Y; Fricker, J D and Labi, S (2019) Quantifying the similarity between different project types based on their pay item compositions: Application to bundling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(9): 04019053, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Similarity between project types is an important consideration in several contexts of construction management, including contract development, contractor selection, and project bundling. Projects that require similar types of resources can generally be considered compatible or similar and thus are prime candidates for simultaneous delivery through project bundling as well as other construction management applications. Unfortunately, there is no universally accepted, robust, and quantitative measure of project similarity. This paper presents a methodology to quantify the similarity between different project types based on their constituent pay items. Two project types are considered similar if they have in common a large percentage of pay items. Cluster analysis was first carried out to evaluate how different project types can be clustered into different groups. Several approaches were then proposed for quantifying the similarity between any two project types and the average similarity among multiple bundled projects. The paper's framework can be used by highway agencies to serve as a guide in making or evaluating construction management-related decisions in various contexts including project bundling.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contract management; pay item; project bundling; project similarity
Index terms: contract management, agency, cluster analysis, bundling, methodology, contractor selection
Subjects: sociology, research methods, tendering, contract management, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Research Practice, Cost Management, Procurement, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here