Enhanced machine learning classification accuracy for scaffolding safety using increased features

Sakhakarmi, S; Park, J and Cho, C (2019) Enhanced machine learning classification accuracy for scaffolding safety using increased features. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(2): 04018133, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Despite regular safety inspections and safety planning, numerous fatal accidents related to scaffold take place at construction sites. Current practices relying on human inspection are not only impractical but also ineffective due to dynamic construction activities. Furthermore, a scaffold typically consists of multiple bays and stories, which leads to complexity in its structural behaviors with various modes of failure. However, previous studies considered only a limited number of failure cases for a simple one-bay scaffold while exploring machine-learning (ML) approaches to predict safety conditions. Thus, the authors have proposed an approach to monitor a complicated scaffolding structure in real time. This study explored a method of classifying scaffolding failure cases and reliably predicting safety conditions based on strain data sets from scaffolding columns. Furthermore, the research team successfully enhanced the predicting accuracy of ML classification by the proposed self-multiplication method to increase the number of features such as strain data sets. Implementation of the proposed methodology is expected to enable the monitoring of a large, complex system at construction sites.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction site; machine learning; safety; support vector machine
Index terms: complexity, machine learning, methodology, accuracy, column, scaffolding, construction site, implementation, real time, safety inspection, monitoring, inspection, complex system, construction activity
Subjects: work location, operations management, artificial intelligence, contractual arrangements, construction operations, control systems, project controls, quality assurance, systems engineering, structural engineering, research methods, professional development
Topics: Time Control, Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here