Solheim-Kile, E and Wald, A (2019) Extending the transactional view on public-private partnership projects: Role of relational and motivational aspects in goal alignment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(5): 04019030, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In public-private partnerships (PPPs), aligning the goals of the public sector with those of the private contractor is usually achieved using incentives informed by agency theory. However, the success of the traditional PPP model has been contested, and recently PPPs have started focusing more on collaboration and investment sharing. So far, this development in practice has barely been reflected in the research. This paper seeks to widen the theoretical lenses on PPPs by developing a theoretical framework integrating agency theory, social capital theory, and self-determination theory. The aim is to allow for a better understanding of incentives for goal alignment by including motivational and relational aspects in addition to the transactional view. A multiple case study comprising four Norwegian PPP projects was conducted to empirically apply and further develop the framework. The findings suggest several benefits of social and psychological mechanisms to goal alignment in PPPs, including trust, reciprocity, and intrinsic motivation. Early involvement of contractors combined with risk sharing and relationship building are important factors to this end.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | agency theory; motivation; public-private partnership; public-private partnership projects; social capital; trust |
| Index terms: | self-determination, collaboration, agency, social capital, motivation, case study, public sector, partnership |
| Subjects: | partnership management, sociology, administrative law, management, psychology, data collection methods, human factors and perception |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 CTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here