Yao, H; Chen, Y; Chen, Y and Zhu, X (2019) Mediating role of risk perception of trust and contract enforcement in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(2): 4018130, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Contract violations have become common problems in construction projects, yet little of the construction contract literature addresses the question of responses to contract violations (i.e., contract enforcement). This research investigates the effects of trust on contract enforcement in a principal-agent relationship and explores the mediating role of risk perception on those effects. The authors distributed 429 electronic questionnaires and received 280 responses. After deleting responses completed in under 100 s and nonmanager responses, we narrowed the total to 253 valid responses from professionals in the Chinese construction industry. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses in this study, and the findings revealed that goodwill-based trust diminishes the severity of contract enforcement, while perceived relational risk and perceived performance risk increase the severity of contract enforcement. Mediation analyses also support the mediating role of perceived relational risk on the effect of goodwill-based trust on contract enforcement. The findings contribute to contract theory by providing a thorough understanding of contract enforcement and developing a conceptual framework consisting of trust, perceived risk, and contract enforcement. Managers from violating parties may benefit from this article through an understanding of the role of trust and perceived risk in dealing with a contract violation and following the strategies recommended for diminishing the severity of contract enforcement.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competence-based trust; contract enforcement; contract violation; goodwill-based trust; perceived performance risk; perceived relational risk |
| Index terms: | strategy, risk perception, mediation, manager, violation, conceptual framework, agent, questionnaire, construction project, competence, contract theory, regression analysis, enforcement, construction industry, construction contract |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, practitioner, data collection methods, contract type, legal systems, health safety and environment, production management, personnel development, management, theoretical framing, regulatory law, industry analysis, statistical analysis, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Procurement, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here