Effect of level of owner-provided design on contractor's design quality in DB/EPC projects

Zhang, S; Liu, X; Gao, Y and Ma, P (2019) Effect of level of owner-provided design on contractor's design quality in DB/EPC projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(1): 04018121, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Although previous studies have suggested that the level of owner-provided design can influence the performance of design-build (DB) projects, few have explicitly and empirically investigated the effect of the level of owner-provided design on the contractor's design quality. This paper fills this gap by empirically investigating the effect of the level of owner-provided design on the design quality of contractors in DB projects. Questionnaires were collected from 243 Chinese project professionals and hierarchical regression analysis was conducted. Empirical results reveal that the level of owner-provided design negatively affects design innovation and positively affects design change. The contractor's competence strengthens the effect of owner-provided design level on design innovation. A minimum proportion of owner-provided design can improve design quality. It is also necessary to ensure the clear articulation of requirements in the request for proposal (RFP). The findings contribute to the understanding of the relationship between the level of owner-provided design and the contractor's design quality in DB projects. These findings also give owners insight into the preparation of the RFP with regard to the optimal level of design.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contractor's competence; design quality; design-build; owner-provided design; request for proposal
Index terms: questionnaire, competence, design change, design quality, proposal, regression analysis, owner
Subjects: contractual arrangements, project planning, professional practice, data collection methods, sociology, statistical analysis, personnel development
Topics: Human Resources, Design Practice, Research Practice, Project Management, Procurement, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here