Augmented balance point diagrams for matching site and concrete-supply resources

Anson, M and Siu, M F F (2020) Augmented balance point diagrams for matching site and concrete-supply resources. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(4): 04020021, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Matching site concrete-placing resources with the appropriate number of concrete-delivery truckmixers depends upon good site and concrete plant coordination if good concreting productivity is to be achieved. In general practice, however, the placing crew usually is idle for some of the pour time waiting for deliveries, and at other times, truckmixers are idle on site waiting to be emptied. In the case of concrete supplied by a circulating fleet of truckmixers, which is a balance point process, two new diagram models were developed relating fleet size to the parameters of placing-crew idle time, truckmixer idle time, truckmixer unloading time, round-trip time, and concrete-placing production rate. The new models augment classical balance point theory. To illustrate practical application: (1) the diagrams were developed and used to reveal system behavior insights for the case of three circulating truckmixers, and (2) the relevance of the new model to a real pour of 46 deliveries was examined in relation to the balancing of site and plant resources for better coordination and system productivity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: balance point theory; concrete-delivery scheduling; concreting system behavior; site productivity optimization; supply and demand resources coordination
Index terms: supply and demand, concreting, productivity, delivery scheduling, placing, coordination
Subjects: concrete and cementitious materials, management, project controls, market analysis, building construction
Topics: Time Control, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Construction Materials
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here