Construction activity recognition and ergonomic risk assessment using a wearable insole pressure system

Antwi-Afari, M F; Li, H; Umer, W; Yu, Y and Xing, X (2020) Construction activity recognition and ergonomic risk assessment using a wearable insole pressure system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(7): 04020077, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Overexertion-related construction activities are identified as a leading cause of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) among construction workers. However, few studies have focused on the automated recognition of overexertion-related construction workers' activities as well as assessing ergonomic risk levels, which may help to minimize WMSDs. Therefore, this study examined the feasibility of using acceleration and foot plantar pressure distribution data captured by a wearable insole pressure system for automated recognition of overexertion-related construction workers' activities and for assessing ergonomic risk levels. The proposed approach was tested by simulating overexertion-related construction activities in a laboratory setting. The classification accuracy of five types of supervised machine learning classifiers was evaluated with different window sizes to investigate classification performance and further estimate physical intensity, activity duration, and frequency information. Cross-validation results showed that the Random Forest classifier with a 2.56-s window size achieved the best classification accuracy of 98.3% and a sensitivity of more than 95.8% for each category of activities using the best features of combined data set. Furthermore, the estimation of corresponding ergonomic risk levels was within the same level of risk. The findings may help to develop a noninvasive wearable insole pressure system for the continuous monitoring and automated activity recognition, which could assist researchers and safety managers in identifying and assessing overexertion-related construction activities for minimizing the development of WMSDs' risks among construction workers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: activity recognition; construction workers; overexertion risk; supervised machine learning classifiers; wearable insole pressure system; work-related musculoskeletal disorders
Index terms: risk assessment, accuracy, validation, forest, monitoring, duration, window, construction activity, construction worker, acceleration, machine learning, estimate, manager, activity recognition, estimation, laboratory
Subjects: modelling and simulation, practitioner, artificial intelligence, environmental science, professional development, financial and cost management, control systems, architectural elements, project controls, construction operations, financial risk, research management
Topics: Site Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Time Control, Information Management, Design Practice, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here