Detection of railway masts in airborne lidar data

Ariyachandra, M R M F and Brilakis, I (2020) Detection of railway masts in airborne lidar data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(9): 04020105, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Generating an object-oriented, geometric digital twin of an existing railway from its point cloud data (PCD) is a laborious task, needing 10 times more labor hours than scanning the physical asset. The resulting modeling cost counteracts the expected benefits of the twin. This cost and effort can be reduced by automating the process of creating such models. The first perceived challenge to achieving such automation is detecting masts from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data because their position and function (separating substructure from superstructure) is critical to the subsequent detection of other elements. This paper presents a method that tackles the aforementioned challenge by leveraging the highly regulated and standardized nature of railways. In railway infrastructure, the geometric relations of a unit contain overhead line equipment (OLE) between two mast pairs are consistent and repetitive throughout the track. The proposed method starts with tools for cleaning the PCD and roughly detecting its positioning and orientation. The resulting data sets are then processed by restricting the search region of the masts considering its positions compared with the track centerline. Subsequently, the masts are detected using the Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) algorithm. The final deliverables of the method include the coordinates of the mast positions, detected point clusters and three-dimensional (3D) models of the masts in Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) format. The method was implemented in a prototype and tested on three railway PCDs with a cumulative length of 18 km. The results indicated that the method achieves an overall detection rate of 94%. This is the first method in automatically detecting masts from airborne LiDAR data.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: geometric digital twin; point cloud data; rail infrastructure
Index terms: cleaning, automation, modelling, industry foundation classes, physical asset, point cloud, prototype, digital twin
Subjects: asset management, digital design, automation and robotics, maintenance engineering, analytical methods, modelling and simulation, digital engineering, computational design
Topics: Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here