Novel probabilistic cost estimation model integrating risk allocation and claim in hydropower project

Chen, Y; Chen, S; Hu, C; Jin, L and Zheng, X (2020) Novel probabilistic cost estimation model integrating risk allocation and claim in hydropower project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(8): 04020092, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The uncertain construction of hydropower projects and fierce market competition put forward more stringent requirements for contractors with regard to accuracy and competitiveness of cost estimation. However, previous probabilistic cost estimation models are mostly devoid of loss-sharing considerations. To fill this gap, this paper proposes a novel probabilistic cost estimation model integrating risk allocation and claim. The bargaining game between the owner and the contractor is first used to determine the proportion of risk allocation in the price fluctuation and the claim amount in the engineering quantity variation. Then, these two key parameters are incorporated into a Monte Carlo-based probabilistic cost risk simulation. The proposed model is applied to an actual hydropower project, and the results show that the risk reserve fund of the proposed model only accounts for 2.66% of the budget under 80% completion probability, and the average cost risk sensitive coefficient of the proposed model has more than tripled. From the results, the cost estimation value calculated by the novel model is more competitive and accurate in bidding; in addition, to reduce additional cost expenditures, the contractor should maintain a high level of patience during negotiations. This research contributes to improving the probability of winning a contract without sacrificing the contractor's profit and to extending the current theory of probabilistic cost estimation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bargaining game; claim; hydropower project; probabilistic cost estimation; risk allocation
Index terms: variation, competition, bidding, cost estimating, accuracy, profit, bargaining, competitiveness, risk allocation, negotiation, hydropower project, owner
Subjects: sociology, conflict resolution, market analysis, economics, professional development, financial risk, contractual condition, financial and cost management, economic analysis, bidding, construction type
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Supply Chain Management, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here