Project-based A/E/C firms' knowledge management capability and market development performance: Does firm size matter

Dang, C N; Chih, Y Y; Le-Hoai, L and Nguyen, L D (2020) Project-based A/E/C firms' knowledge management capability and market development performance: Does firm size matter. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(11): 04020127, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Project-based architecture, engineering, and construction (A/E/C) firms' survival depends largely on their market development performance. Given the knowledge-intensive nature of their offerings, A/E/C firms that can develop and leverage their knowledge bases are likely to enjoy superior market positions. Based on empirical data collected from 108 A/E/C firms in Vietnam, this study investigated the effect of A/E/C firms' knowledge-management capability (KMC) on their market development performance, and the moderating role of firm size in this relationship. The results revealed that A/E/C firms' KMC positively affects their market development performance, and this positive effect is stronger in small/medium-sized A/E/C firms than in large firms. These findings provide empirical evidence for small/medium-sized A/E/C firms to invest in their knowledge-management infrastructure (e.g., organizational values/norms, policies/procedures, employee development, and information infrastructure) and processes (e.g., socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization) to secure superior market positions. Theoretically, this research broadens and deepens understanding of the link between KMC and organizational performance (i.e., market development performance) and the contingent contextual factors (i.e., firm size) in the project-based construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: a/e/c firms; knowledge management; knowledge-management capability; market development performance; project-based
Index terms: Vietnam, knowledge base, evidence, norms, knowledge management, organizational value, organizational performance, construction industry, survival
Subjects: environmental science, business, evaluation and assessment methods, sociology, information systems, industry analysis, performance measurement, professional development, Geography
Topics: Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Sustainability, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here