Enshassi, M S A; Walbridge, S; West, J S and Haas, C T (2020) Dynamic and proactive risk-based methodology for managing excessive geometric variability issues in modular construction projects using Bayesian theory. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(2): 04019096, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Managing excessive geometric variability risks (i.e., out-of-tolerance and out-of-alignment issues) represents a major challenge in modular construction projects, owing to lack of accurate data on modularization process capabilities for fabrication, transportation, and erection at the early design phase. Unrealistic and insufficient modularization process capability data typically convey a misleading risk profile and result in suboptimal mitigation solutions, which can in turn lead to cost overruns, schedule delays, quality issues, and owner dissatisfaction. Current modularization practices and previously developed risk management frameworks apply static risk assessment and management techniques, which do not enable updating of the generic information and initial assessment of the risk profile, when more realistic data become available. To address this persistent challenge in modular construction projects, this paper aims to introduce a systematic methodology that employs Bayesian inference theory for the dynamic assessment and proactive management of excessive geometric variability issues. The developed methodology includes a practical process for continual (1) updating of initial estimates of the performance of tolerance-based mitigation strategies based on real-time data, (2) reassessment of the risk profile, and (3) refinement of risk response decisions. The results of the case study described subsequently in this paper demonstrate how key project stakeholders and modular construction managers (e.g., designers, fabricators, and contractors) can use this methodology to efficiently reduce uncertainty in tolerance-related risk estimates and proactively manage impacts to improve modularization performance and maximize its benefits.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bayesian theory; decision support; dynamic risk assessment; excessive geometric variability; modular construction; proactive management; tolerances |
| Index terms: | designer, cost overrun, owner, case study, real-time data, schedule delay, fabrication, variability, estimate, risk management, design phase, quality issue, risk assessment, modularization, risk response, strategy, decision support, manager, project stakeholder, mitigation, methodology, modular construction |
| Subjects: | practitioner, risk assessment, profession, data collection methods, financial and cost management, professional practice, financial risk, research methods, management, manufacturing engineering, statistical analysis, quality assurance, sociology, decision analysis, building construction, project controls, data management |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here