Firouzi, A and Khayyati, M (2020) Bayesian updating of Copula-based probabilistic project-duration model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(5): 04020046, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents a generic copula-based method for accurate prediction of probabilistic time performance of projects. The proposed stepwise method first collates all uncertainties of the project activities and propagates them using a Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) in cumulative progress S-curves and commercial project risk analysis software. By fitting the beta distribution function to every normalized simulated progress curve, the corresponding parameters of the so-called Beta-S model can be calculated and the best-fit marginal distribution functions of these parameters, including project completion time, and the correlation matrix can be established. In an innovative approach, a multivariate copula function then is employed to bind the marginal distribution function of these random variables together and produce their prior joint probability distribution as a single closed-form function. The merit of this copula-based function is that it alleviates the incorrect assumption of the independence of random variables in the Beta-S model. The actual progress data of the project are used for efficient Bayesian updating of the model by means of the Metropolis-Hastings (M-H) algorithm. The applicability of the proposed methodology is demonstrated on a project, and it is shown to outperform the existing probabilistic model with independent variables and the earned schedule method as a deterministic method.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bayesian updating; Copula; earned value; metropolis-hastings algorithm; Monte Carlo simulation; project management |
| Index terms: | s-curve, project risk analysis, project management, duration, probability distribution, independent variable, Monte Carlo simulation, completion time, distribution function, methodology, time performance |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, research methods, economics, probability and distributions, project management theory and practice, financial risk, project controls, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Time Control, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here