Performance of resource-constrained scheduling heuristics

Franco-Duran, D M and De La Garza, J M (2020) Performance of resource-constrained scheduling heuristics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(4): 04020026, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Over the years, the study of resource-constrained scheduling heuristics has focused on testing different sets of priority rules without paying attention to the conditions under which each heuristic produces better results. Although some authors have recommended the use of specific heuristics over any other rule, these recommendations are general and do not encompass all possible project characteristics in terms of resources and network topology. Without a guidance system, schedulers must try several combinations of rules until they find one that compares favorably (shortest duration) with the results of the other priority rules. This study proposes a new tiebreaker (priority number) that enhances the performance of an existing heuristic and classifies the heuristics' performance based on specific project characteristics. The results show that, as a tiebreaker of the late finish rule, the priority number leads to obtain schedules with lower deviations from the critical path method (CPM) duration and a higher number of shortest schedules than with traditional tiebreakers. The proposed classification system indicates the two heuristics with the best performance for specific resource network characteristics. This classification will help practitioners to decide which heuristic applies when mitigating the resource supply-demand problem given the project characteristics.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: heuristics; resource-constrained scheduling; tiebreaker
Index terms: duration, scheduling, scheduler, deviation, practitioner, testing, performance-based, topology, critical path method, heuristic
Subjects: practitioner, risk assessment, project controls, geometry and topology, professional practice, financial and cost management, performance measurement, operations research
Topics: Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Time Control, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here