Gao, N and Touran, A (2020) Cost overruns and formal risk assessment program in US rail transit projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(5): 05020004, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Cost overrun in rail transit projects in the United States is a pervasive and constant phenomenon, yet there has been a lack of rigorous statistical analysis on project costs. This has been partly due to the difficulty of obtaining reliable cost data and the small size of the sample. In addition, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has required formal risk assessment on transit projects since 2003. Whether this strategy has improved the accuracy of cost estimates is not known. To fill these gaps, this study has collected the cost data of 81 US rail transit projects built during the last 40 years, the largest sample of its kind. It is found that the accuracy of cost estimates at the decision-making phase has improved over time. Also, major projects have higher percentage cost overruns than smaller projects. Further, the accuracy of cost estimates decrease as project implementation durations increase. The utilized statistical methods yielded no evidence to suggest that cost overruns differ between projects designed before and after 2003, when the FTA risk assessment program started. However, since project size and implementation duration have increased over time, the positive impact of the FTA risk assessment program can be inferred and acknowledged to some extent. This research can serve as a reference point for studies on the accuracy of conceptual cost estimates and help in budgeting future projects. It can also help in understanding the causes of cost overruns in capital projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost overruns; Federal Transit Administration; risk assessment program; project implementation duration; project size; rail transit projects |
| Index terms: | implementation, major project, cost data, program, risk assessment, decision-making, statistical method, evidence, budgeting, project cost, strategy, duration, United States, statistical analysis, cost estimate, accuracy, capital project, cost overrun |
| Subjects: | professional development, statistical analysis, contractual arrangements, financial and cost management, data science, economics, financial management, evaluation and assessment methods, decision analysis, project controls, Geography, financial risk, software systems, accounting and finance, management, strategic project management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Business Strategy, Project Management, Time Control, Information Management, Cost Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here