Gao, S; Song, X and Ding, R (2020) Promoting information transfer in collaborative projects through network structure adjustment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(2): 04019108, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The information transfer process in collaborative projects is dynamic and nonlinear, and the structure of network influences the efficiency and effectiveness of information transfer in a collaborative project network (CPN). The purpose of this study was to explore the dynamic information transfer mechanism in CPNs by simulation method and promote the efficiency and effectiveness of information transfer through network structure adjustment. The collaborative project network information transfer (CPNIT) model was established based on the theories of information theory, agent-based modeling, and social network analysis. The key part of the model is the rules system, which includes four sets: the rules of information dissemination, information absorption, efficiency and effectiveness evaluation, and network structure adjustment strategies. A case study was conducted, including parallel simulation experiments with three scenarios of adjustment strategies. The results showed that the model can accurately present the dynamic processes of information transfer in CPNs, and the structure adjustments were demonstrated to have great effect on the efficiency and effectiveness of information transfer. This study developed the theory of information transfer in collaborative projects from the network perspective and determined the dynamic mechanism of information transfer. The findings also provide decision-making strategies for project managers to improve organizational communication performance that is beneficial to project success.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | information dissemination, agent-based modelling, simulation experiment, efficiency, project success, case study, project manager, effectiveness, collaborative project, communication performance, social network analysis, strategy, decision-making, information theory |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, project management theory and practice, research methods, performance management, communication studies, management, contractual arrangements, knowledge organization and systems, modelling and simulation, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, profession |
| Topics: | Procurement, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here