Gao, Y; González, V A and Yiu, T W (2020) Exploring the relationship between construction workers' personality traits and safety behavior. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3): 04019111, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In the workplace, some workers tend to have a higher probability of incurring an accident. Such individuals might behave unsafely because they assign low priority to safety. Some evidence in the literature suggests that people's personalities could influence their safety behavior at work. However, it seems that the correlation between construction workers' personality traits and safety behavior has been insufficiently addressed in the existing literature. This paper attempts to provide evidence on this issue. Two hundred and eighty workers were surveyed to gather data concerning personality traits and safety behavior. The results indicated that across the set of Big Five personality traits, conscientiousness revealed the strongest correlation with workers' safety behavior, followed by extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. In addition, agreeableness and conscientiousness were found to be positively correlated with workers' safety behavior whereas extraversion and neuroticism were negatively correlated with workers' safety behavior. These findings seem to imply practical implications. For example, some tasks, such as operating construction machinery, require focused attention and stable emotions, which may not be suitable for people who score high in neuroticism. Site managers may take into consideration the personality traits of an individual when selecting personnel and allocating tasks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction sector; personality traits; safety behavior |
| Index terms: | safety behaviour, personality, site manager, construction worker, personnel, evidence, construction sector |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, industry analysis, behavioral psychology, management, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here