Machine learning algorithms for construction projects delay risk prediction

Gondia, A; Siam, A; El-Dakhakhni, W and Nassar, A H (2020) Machine learning algorithms for construction projects delay risk prediction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(1): 04019085, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Projects delays are among the most pressing challenges faced by the construction sector attributed to the sector's complexity and its inherent delay risk sources' interdependence. Machine learning offers an ideal set of techniques capable of tackling such complex systems; however, adopting such techniques within the construction sector remains at an early stage. The goal of this study was to identify and develop machine learning models in order to facilitate accurate project delay risk analysis and prediction using objective data sources. As such, relevant delay risk sources and factors were first identified, and a multivariate data set of previous projects' time performance and delay-inducing risk sources was then compiled. Subsequently, the complexity and interdependence of the system was uncovered through an exploratory data analysis. Accordingly, two suitable machine learning models, utilizing decision tree and naïve Bayesian classification algorithms, were identified and trained using the data set for predicting project delay extents. Finally, the predictive performances of both models were evaluated through cross validation tests, and the models were further compared using machine-learning-relevant performance indices. The evaluation results indicated that the naïve Bayesian model provides a better predictive performance for the data set examined. Ultimately, the work presented herein harnesses the power of machine learning to facilitate evidence-based decision making, while inherent risk factors are active, interdependent, and dynamic, thus empowering proactive project risk management strategies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: classification; complex systems; confusion matrices; construction projects; cross validation; delay risk analysis; machine learning; predictive data analytics; risk identification; time delay
Index terms: time delay, decision tree, risk factor, interdependence, project risk management, complex system, construction project, decision-making, time performance, validation, evidence, construction sector, risk analysis, machine learning, project delay, complexity, data analysis, strategy, risk identification
Subjects: organizational analysis, project controls, decision analysis, industry analysis, environmental hazards, systems engineering, management, production management, professional development, financial risk, artificial intelligence, data analysis and analytics, evaluation and assessment methods
Topics: Digital Applications, Time Control, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here