Han, Y; Li, J; Cao, X and Jin, R (2020) Structural equation modeling approach to studying the relationships among safety investment, construction employees' safety cognition, and behavioral performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(7): 04020065, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the internal relationships between safety investments and construction employees' behavioral performance with safety cognition as the mediating factor. A comprehensive methodology was adopted, including theoretical modeling of safety investments, survey questionnaire, and structural equation modeling (SEM). In the theoretical model, four factors were used as safety investment categories: personal protection equipment (PPE), safety education, insurance purchased for site employees, and safety incentives. These four categories were studied for their correlation to the overall safety investment, which was tested for its contribution to employees' behavioral safety performance in both direct and indirect ways. Indirectly, safety cognition was introduced as a mediator to bridge safety investments and behavioral performance. A questionnaire consisting of 28 indicators was adopted to describe safety investment, safety cognition, and behavioral performance. A random sampling approach and the top-down method were implemented to recruit construction site employees from the southeastern region of China. The followup SEM analysis revealed that all four investment categories positively contributed to the overall safety investment, which was found significantly correlated to employees' safety cognition and behavioral performance. Safety incentive was identified as the most significant factor contributing to the overall investment. The current study extends prior studies of safety investments by adopting a quantitative approach from the employees' perspective. Insights are offered to construction employers on how safety investments can affect behavioral performance - for example, the importance of balancing the tangible (e.g., incentive) and intangible (e.g., safety insurance) investment categories. This study also contributes to establishing the internal links among safety investments, safety cognition, and behavioral safety performance. Based on the current findings, future work could investigate how to optimize safety investments to achieve better behavioral performance. The current study, based in China, could be applied in a different geographic context by testing the correlations between safety investments and behavioral safety performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction employee; safety behavior; safety cognition; safety investment; structural equation modeling |
| Index terms: | modelling, testing, insurance, sampling, construction employee, safety behaviour, mediator, China, safety performance, methodology, cognition, questionnaire, structural equation modelling, construction site, survey |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, occupational health and safety management, cognitive psychology, Geography, research methods, professional practice, analytical methods, economic analysis, work location, practitioner, dispute resolution, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here