He, C; McCabe, B; Jia, G and Sun, J (2020) Effects of safety climate and safety behavior on safety outcomes between supervisors and construction workers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(1): 04019092, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Safety climate and safety performance in construction projects vary at an organization level and group level. However, the differences between supervisors and construction workers are rarely examined. This study compared the safety climate, safety behavior (safety compliance and safety participation), and safety outcomes (injuries, unsafe events, and stress) between these two social groups. The relationships among these variables were also contrasted with each other using the structural equation modeling (SEM) technique. The data were collected from 119 supervisors and 536 site workers at 22 construction projects in China. The results show that four dimensions of safety climate were distinctly different between supervisors and workers, which is consistent with the social identity theory. Two dimensions of the supervisors' safety behavior were significantly better than those of the workers' behavior, while supervisors suffered higher stress. The relationships between safety climate and safety behavior were positively associated for both groups. However, the links from safety climate to safety outcomes and from safety behavior to safety outcomes significantly differed between supervisors and construction workers, which revealed a complementation phenomenon. This study sheds light on group-level safety performance research. It also suggests that safety professionals should take group-targeted safety intervention measures and pay more attention to supervisors' psychological well-being.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | comparative analysis; construction workers; safety behavior; safety climate; safety outcome; social identity |
| Index terms: | supervisor, dimension, construction worker, safety behaviour, social identity theory, safety performance, China, social identity, construction project, well-being, comparative analysis, structural equation modelling, injury, safety climate, compliance |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, health monitoring assessment and metrics, practitioner, mental health and wellbeing, statistical analysis, occupational health and safety management, sociology, health conditions and diseases, health safety and environment, Geography, production management, social psychology |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here