Hegazy, T; Saad, D A and Mostafa, K (2020) Enhanced repetitive-scheduling computation and visualization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(10): 04020118, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Whereas extensive literature exists on repetitive scheduling to help projects benefit from repetition and resource continuity, its underlying formulations suffer from serious challenges that often create less-efficient lengthy schedules. This paper, therefore, presents a framework with novel visuals and enhanced schedule computations that can generate shortest feasible schedules that address the key constraints of deadlines, limited resources, and nonidentical units. On the visual side, the framework integrates the LOB and Flowline visuals to enhance schedule legibility. On the computational side, it presents a novel three-step procedure to guarantee the shortest feasible schedules: (1) critical path method-line of balance (CPM-LOB) formulation of the number of parallel crews needed to meet deadlines; (2) interruption-time formulation to reduce schedule delay under crew limits; and (3) first-come first-served multicrew assignment process to reduce the schedule time-gaps and delays under nonidentical units. Manually-solved examples are used to demonstrate the power and streamlined applicability of the proposed framework. The paper is beneficial to both researchers and practitioners and contributes to mathematically generating legible and near-optimum repetitive schedules, under key constraints, without extra measures or sophisticated optimization.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; critical path method; line of balance; delta-shift; first-come first-served; flowline; line of balance; repetitive projects; repetitive scheduling; scheduling; visualization |
| Index terms: | visualization, critical path method, computation, practitioner, line of balance, repetitive scheduling, scheduling, guarantee, key constraint, schedule delay, repetitive project |
| Subjects: | computational methods, control systems, practitioner, operations research, design practice, contract structure, production management, project controls |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Time Control, Project Management, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here