Simulation-based lift planning model for the lift transfer operation system

Kim, T; Lee, D; Cha, M; Lim, H; Lee, M; Cho, H and Kang, K I (2020) Simulation-based lift planning model for the lift transfer operation system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(9): 04020098, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Producing adequate lift plans for a transfer operation system (TOS) used in irregularly shaped high-rise building constructions is a more complex task than for an all-floor lift operation system. In the TOS, a resource whose destination floor is higher than the current zone must transfer to one of the lifts of the upper zone at the transfer area after passing through the current zone. This transfer process requires waiting time at the transfer area, which is repeated until the resource arrives at its destination floor. However, the current lift planning method for the TOS considers each zone to be completely independent, which underestimates the required number of lifts and results in the late delivery of resources to the work floors. Therefore, this study proposes a simulation-based lift planning model for the TOS. The proposed model helps a lift planner to find an optimal lift plan for the TOS with the lowest cost while satisfying the constraints of the total lifting time and average journey time within a short planning time. Furthermore, the proposed model contributes to successful project completion by transporting resources to work floors in a timely manner.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: genetic algorithm; irregularly shaped high-rise building; lift planning; lift transfer operation system
Index terms: high-rise building, planning method, lifting, planner, genetic algorithm, lowest cost
Subjects: urban planning, algorithms, profession, bidding, occupational health and safety management, construction type
Topics: Governance, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Digital Applications, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here