Knowledge sharing and productivity improvement: An agent-based modeling approach

Kiomjian, D; Srour, I and Srour, F J (2020) Knowledge sharing and productivity improvement: An agent-based modeling approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(7): 04020076, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Labor productivity is a major determinant of project performance in construction. Models of labor productivity in construction tend to focus on learning curve theories that assume learning is an individual process with no transfer of knowledge among crew members. This paper seeks to extend theories of individual learning to capture the crew dynamics present on construction sites. Accordingly, this paper presents an agent-based model aimed at deriving the impacts of crew composition and project schedule on knowledge sharing and, thus, on task duration. The proposed model was calibrated using field observations of 201 interactions among 12 construction workers at a construction project in Beirut, Lebanon. The results indicate that more diverse crews witness higher levels of knowledge sharing and greater productivity gains. The results also suggest that schedules keeping all the workers busy eliminate the potential for knowledge sharing and thus only benefit from the baseline gains seen in individual learning. This work contributes to the literature by developing an agent-based model that simulates knowledge sharing in the construction industry at the worker level. The study is limited by its exclusion of multiskilled workers.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: construction project, Lebanon, agent, construction site, knowledge sharing, dynamics, project performance, labour productivity, construction worker, duration, construction industry, interaction, determinant, productivity, agent-based modelling
Subjects: practitioner, risk assessment, knowledge management, work location, modelling and simulation, project management theory and practice, production management, Geography, management, behavioral psychology, systems engineering, industry analysis, project controls
Topics: Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here