Empirical bid or no bid decision process in international construction projects: Structural equation modeling framework

Li, G; Zhang, G; Chen, C and Martek, I (2020) Empirical bid or no bid decision process in international construction projects: Structural equation modeling framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6): 04020050, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The bid or no bid decision in international construction projects requires complex multiattribute analysis. Thus far, there exists no comprehensive framework to support the decision process. The objective of this study is to construct such a framework to support international contractors. Following a comprehensive literature review, five criteria and 41 factors were identified that bear on the decision. Questionnaire surveys were used to collect experts' opinions on the importance of these factors in the decision of Chinese international contractors (CICs). The 41 factors were classified into six groups using factor analysis, with relationships among them validated through structural equation modeling (SEM). By integrating the five criteria with the six factors, a systematic framework for a no bid decision was developed. The outcome reveals that the bidding decision is a multistage decision process conducted in the following sequence: country risk vulnerability → ability to perform → project risk vulnerability → profitability → probability of winning. In validating this framework, a case study was also examined. Thus, this paper contributes to the body of knowledge on bid or no bid decision-making by offering an empirical framework that effectively links factors to criteria, and which sets out a basis on which contractors may rationally base a bid or no bid decision in the international arena.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bid or no bid decision; decision framework; international construction; partial least squares-structural equation modeling
Index terms: profitability, factor analysis, international construction, decision process, decision framework, case study, international construction project, bidding, body of knowledge, partial least square, vulnerability, questionnaire, decision-making, survey, structural equation modelling, literature review
Subjects: economic analysis, knowledge management, data analysis and analytics, bidding, strategic management, data collection methods, decision analysis, statistical analysis, environmental hazards
Topics: Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here