Liu, C; AbouRizk, S; Morley, D and Lei, Z (2020) Data-driven simulation-based analytics for heavy equipment life-cycle cost. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(5): 04020038, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Heavy civil and mining construction industries rely greatly on the usage of heavy equipment. Managing a heavy-equipment fleet in a cost-efficient manner is key for long-term profitability. To ensure the cost-efficiency of equipment management, practitioners are required to accurately quantify the equipment life-cycle cost, instead of merely depending on the empirical method. This study proposes a data-driven, simulation-based analytics to quantify the life-cycle cost of heavy equipment, incorporating both maintenance and ownership costs. In the proposed methodology, the K-means clustering and expectation-maximization (EM) algorithms are applied for input modeling to distinguish the maintenance stages, and to further generate corresponding distributions of these points. These distributions then are used to quantify the uncertainties embedded in the equipment costs through simulations. A historical data set of ownership and maintenance costs for a mining truck model was used to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of the proposed approach. This approach was proven to be effective in predicting the cumulative total cost of equipment, which provides analytical decision support for equipment-management practitioners.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | data-driven simulation-based analytics; equipment management; life-cycle cost analysis |
| Index terms: | ownership, profitability, mining, maintenance cost, clustering, construction industry, modelling, efficiency, validity, practitioner, methodology, decision support, equipment cost, cost analysis, maximization, equipment management |
| Subjects: | data science, financial and cost management, analytical methods, economic analysis, operational management, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, industry analysis, decision analysis, geotechnical engineering, financial management, algorithms, research methods, economics, performance management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Plant and Equipment, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here