Negash, Y T and Hassan, A M (2020) Construction project success under uncertainty: Interrelations among the external environment, intellectual capital, and project attributes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(10): 05020012, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Prior studies have focused on identifying and ranking critical success factors (CSFs), but both their interdependence and the vagueness resulting from human judgment have been neglected. Furthermore, there is a need to explain CSFs from the short- and long-term planning horizons. This study aims to identify, rank, and examine the interdependence of the critical factors affecting construction projects in low-income economies. The study applied the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) to validate subfactors identified from the literature. The hierarchical relationship between success factors and linguistic preferences is considered by using a fuzzy analytical hierarchical process (FAHP) and a fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (FDEMATEL) methodology. The former is applied to rank the relative weights of the factors and subfactors, and the latter is used to discover the nature of their interrelationship. The results indicate that over the short term, the relationships with the clients, consultants, designers, top management, and the financial situation of the contractor are essential. However, for strategic management and long-term success, the most influential factors are the external environment and the types of projects undertaken. Therefore, the economic climate, technical and professional capabilities, and costs, funds, and resources should be the primary concerns when establishing the project goals. Furthermore, this study provides managerial and theoretical implications to guide construction projects from both short- and long-term perspectives.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction project success; external environment; fuzzy analytical hierarchical process; fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory; fuzzy Delphi; intellectual capital |
| Index terms: | construction project, strategic management, influential factor, decision-making, top management, methodology, preference, critical success factor, laboratory, success factor, income, fuzzy Delphi, interdependence, judgment, critical factor, designer |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, risk assessment, profession, control systems, dispute resolution, research management, decision analysis, organizational analysis, decision-making and optimization, decision-making and reasoning, research methods, management, production management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here