Newaz, M T; Davis, P; Jefferies, M and Pillay, M (2020) Examining the psychological contract as mediator between the safety behavior of supervisors and workers on construction sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(1): 04019094, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Issues regarding relationships between supervisor safety behavior (SSB) and worker safety behavior (WSB) are well recognized in construction management research. Nevertheless, how safety plans are articulated through the actions of supervisors to the workforce remains unclear. By conceptualizing safety from the window of the "psychological contract" (PC), this research proposes that if the "psychological contract of safety" (PCS) - if reciprocal commitments between a supervisor and a worker are fulfilled - then WSB will be positively influenced. Using a PCS scale based on employer obligations, multilevel surveys were performed at five construction sites in Sydney, Australia, and data from 352 workers associated with a mega-construction project were collected. A hypothetical model proposing the PCS as an intervention is presented. The model is validated using structural equation modeling (SEM), the data reliability and validity of the survey findings are ensured, and the goodness of fit of the proposed model was examined. The results indicate that PCS successfully mediates the relationship between two important safety agents - the supervisor and the worker. When addressing the research gap, this article explains how the concept of PCS can be further utilized to investigate safety issues that are regularly raised. In addition, new avenues for researchers and practitioners are suggested to consider the social exchange relationships at construction sites. Using the validated PCS model and understanding the level of fulfillment, construction supervisors may influence workers' behavior with greater confidence. Furthermore, when finding a low level of fulfillment of PCS, senior managers can deliver training to supervisors to improve their safety behavior to the benefit of WSB.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety; psychological contract; safety behavior; supervisor; worker |
| Index terms: | supervisor, psychological contract, safety behaviour, validity, Australia, low level, mediator, construction safety, agent, practitioner, window, construction project, survey, safety issue, construction site, structural equation modelling, commitment, management research, manager |
| Subjects: | practitioner, dispute resolution, research design and methodology, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, work location, psychology, financial risk, Geography, production management, architectural elements, statistical analysis, environmental health, measurement and scaling, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here