Ogunrinde, O; Amirkhanian, A; Corley, M and Nnaji, C (2020) Effect of nighttime construction on quality of asphalt paving. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(9): 04020111, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The need to meet increasing economic vitality has caused continued deterioration of road surfaces owing to the constant use fueled by high traffic volume. Nighttime paving operations are often seen as a viable solution to reduce traffic disruptions due to maintenance and construction activities. However, state highway agencies (SHAs) are uncertain as to whether the quality of nighttime paving is at the same level of daytime paving. Although percent within limits (PWL) has shown great promise as a quality-based pay factor tool, limited empirical research exists that focuses on using this process as a postconstruction pay tool. The goal of this study is to assess the impact of nighttime and daytime paving on pavement quality using PWL. To achieve the goal of this study, data extracted from a review of existing literature and archival studies were analyzed using multiple statistical tools. This study examines rideability quality for 86 different projects from both nighttime and daytime asphalt paving projects over a 2-year period in South Carolina. It was found that nighttime projects were awarded more rideability bonus payouts while daytime projects were awarded more 100% rideability payouts. This study fills a gap in knowledge and practices by providing relevant information required to use PWL as a tool for measuring, enhancing, and optimizing quality or asphalt pavement. SHAs should consider including PWL in highway contracts as a tool for assessing the quality of projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asphalt paving; award type; highway construction; pay factor; percent within limit; quality |
| Index terms: | highway construction, construction activity, agency, paving, asphalt pavement, deterioration |
| Subjects: | material degradation and durability, construction operations, sociology, transportation engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, civil engineering |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here