Salas, R; Hallowell, M; Balaji, R and Bhandari, S (2020) Safety risk tolerance in the construction industry: Cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(4): 04020022, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Disparities in worker risk tolerance may create barriers to implementing safety management systems and improving safety performance. At present, it is unclear if and to what extent construction safety risk tolerance vary across broad geographic regions. To better understand patterns in these sociocultural constructs, a survey of building trade contractors and subcontractors was administered. Using principal component analysis and K-means clustering, the determinants of risk tolerance were analyzed for 11,997 construction workers from 17 countries via controlled sampling for equal representation. The analysis showed that risk tolerance is influenced and linked by individual and sociocultural determinants, i.e., affective associations, control beliefs, safety culture, and risk-taking attitudes. Differences and distinct groupings were observed when the derived global risk tolerance scores were compared to country-specific risk-tolerance scores. This study contributes to the literature by empirically identifying determinants of risk tolerance and quantifying cross-cultural disparities in risk tolerance. It was found that the natural grouping of countries, based on their risk-tolerance determinants, coincides with their ancestral heritage and socioeconomic systems. The results can be used to inform policymakers, stakeholders, safety professionals, and industry leaders to improve safety decisions in the workplace, promote strong situational awareness, design structural policies, and implement safety programs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; cross-culture; fundamental social cause; risk tolerance; safety; situational awareness |
| Index terms: | survey, risk taking, safety performance, building trade, subcontractor, safety programs, construction safety, safety culture, safety management system, determinant, construction industry, clustering, disparity, construction worker, sampling, principal component analysis |
| Subjects: | social justice, occupational health and safety management, statistical analysis, environmental health, industry analysis, decision-making and reasoning, health safety and environment, data science, risk assessment, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Ethics, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here