Signor, R; Love, P E D; Belarmino, A T N and Alfred Olatunji, O (2020) Detection of collusive tenders in infrastructure projects: Learning from operation car wash. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(1): 05019015, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Procurement practices are often characterized by competitive tendering. The overarching purpose of this is to ingrain transparency, probity, and value for money into the processes of acquiring goods and services. When tenderers collude and clients are unable to detect them, bids will become uncompetitive. Yet, there have been a limited number of effective practical tools and methods developed that can be used by procurement authorities, controllers, and public officials to detect collusive tendering. Using data obtained from the Brazilian Federal Police and their ongoing criminal investigation titled Operation Car Wash, a robust and practical probabilistic method is developed. The main findings were that the method was able to accurately identify (81%-96%) the occurrence of collusion during a sealed tendering process. Conclusions are drawn from the lessons learned from the forensic investigations, indicating that the approach presented for detecting collusive behavior during tendering is grounded in reality. This paper presents a new way to utilize statistics and probability to identify the presence of and control collusion in public- and private-sector tendering.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Brazil; collusion; corruption; public procurement; sealed tender |
| Index terms: | value-for-money, lessons learned, corruption, collusion, Brazil, competitive tendering, transparency, infrastructure project, statistics, investigation, presence, tendering process |
| Subjects: | mathematical modelling, data collection methods, environmental science, evaluation, professional development, Geography, tendering, infrastructure and transport systems, professional ethics |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Value Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Sustainability, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here