Tan, T; Lu, W; Tan, G; Xue, F; Chen, K; Xu, J; Wang, J and Gao, S (2020) Construction-oriented design for manufacture and assembly guidelines. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(8): 04020085, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The pursuit of modern product sophistication and production efficiency has bolstered design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) around the world. Being both a design philosophy and a methodology, DfMA has existed in manufacturing for decades. It is coming into vogue in construction as a potential solution to the industry's lackluster productivity amid enduring exhortation of cross-sectoral learning. However, many studies of DfMA in construction are still simply following the DfMA guidelines developed from manufacturing without adequately considering important differences between the two sectors of construction and manufacturing. This study aims to develop a series of construction-oriented DfMA guidelines by adopting a mixed-method approach. It critiques existing DfMA guidelines in relation to the characteristics of construction and further argues that construction-oriented DfMA should consider five fundamental aspects: Contextual basis, technology rationalization, logistics optimization, component integration, and material-lightening, either individually or collectively. A case study is then conducted to substantiate and verify the feasibility of these guidelines. This research sheds new light on the cross-sectoral learning of DfMA from manufacturing to construction. The guidelines can be used as the benchmark for the evaluation of manufacturability and assemblability in practice. It also opens up a new avenue for further DfMA studies in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture; assembly; design for manufacture and assembly; design guidelines; manufacturing |
| Index terms: | critique, productivity, case study, efficiency, design for manufacture and assembly, manufacturability, philosophy, methodology, integration |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, philosophical studies, organizational analysis, manufacturing engineering, management, research methods, performance management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Quality Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 CTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here