Wibowo, A and Sundermeier, M (2020) Developing a fuzzy value-for-money analysis model for annuity-based public-private partnership infrastructure projects under consideration of risk mitigation capability. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(7): 04020081, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Optimal allocation of risk between the public and private sector is instrumental to the enhancement of value-for-money (VFM) for public-private partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects. This study offers a novel method that considers the risk mitigation capability (RMC) of the public and private sector to evaluate VFM of a PPP infrastructure project under the performance-based annuity (PPP/AP) scheme. It is the first attempt to incorporate both the RMC and risk allocation decisions into VFM development quantitatively. This model applies a combination of the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy inference system and statistical methods. The perceptional data from Indonesian PPP experts were collected to estimate model parameters and assess the VFM of a 73 km Indonesian public road, and then used to illustrate the application of the model. The result shows that moderate levels of RMC for both the public and private sector, worsened by suboptimal risk allocation, lead to a no-go decision with PPP/AP. The proposed model makes earlier PPP decision-making possible for the public sector before invitations for bids.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | annuity payment; public-private partnership; risk control capability; risk cost reduction; risk mitigation capability; Takagi-Sugeno; Indonesia |
| Index terms: | fuzzy inference, decision-making, risk mitigation, value-for-money, performance-based, cost reduction, Indonesia, private sector, partnership, public sector, annuity, statistical method, risk allocation, infrastructure project, estimate |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, administrative law, decision-making and optimization, decision analysis, partnership management, evaluation, financial risk, Geography, economics, performance measurement, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Value Management, Quality Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here