Yuan, H and Yang, Y (2020) BIM adoption under government subsidy: Technology diffusion perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(1): 4019089, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Although building information modeling (BIM) holds the promise of significantly advancing the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) market worldwide, its widespread acceptance and adoption is still an unsolved issue. From a technology diffusion perspective, this paper proposes a game theory-based model including two firms who both are potential BIM adopters under support from the government (i.e., subsidy). Two influential factors affecting AEC firms' BIM adoption decisions are identified, including BIM adoption efficiency and adoption incentives. Through analyzing the model with a backward-induction method, AEC firms' best responses of joining time and the government's optimal subsidizing strategies are discussed. The findings show that the government subsidy is effective in promoting BIM adoption because the subsidy can both bring forward the joining time and enhance BIM adoption efficiency by offsetting firms' setup costs. Under the government's subsidy policies, AEC firms that are originally negative toward BIM adoption can become positive, which demonstrates the occurrence of BIM technology diffusion. Theoretical and practice implications are also discussed. This study contributes to a new perspective for understanding BIM adoption behaviors among AEC firms. In addition, the study for the first time introduces game theory into explaining BIM adoption and diffusion, which may benefit BIM implementation and enhance the effectiveness of policies aiming at promoting BIM application practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adoption; building information modeling; diffusion; government subsidy; information technology |
| Index terms: | implementation, effectiveness, building information modelling, subsidy, efficiency, information technology, influential factor, strategy, game theory |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, decision models, economic analysis, computing systems, risk assessment, information systems, management, performance management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Risk Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here