Zhan, W and Pan, W (2020) Formulating systemic construction productivity enhancement strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(8): 05020008, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Studies that have measured construction productivity, analyzed its influencing parameters, and explored enhancement strategies abound in the literature. However, few have quantified the relationship between the total factor productivity (TFP) of the construction industry and its parameters, nor have they provided quantitative evidence supporting the formulation and implementation of construction productivity enhancement strategies (CPES). This paper demonstrates a novel mixed-methods design that develops a systemic framework of construction TFP enhancement. The study measured the TFP of the construction industry, examined the systemic nature of its influencing parameters, explored its relationship with these parameters, and identified the dynamic nature of construction productivity enhancement measures and strategies. The developed research methods were validated and contextualized within the context of the Hong Kong construction industry which faces significant issues such as labor shortage, aging workforce, and high construction costs that beg for urgent productivity improvement. Applying the proposed methods to the Hong Kong construction industry, 15 measures and 4 strategies were identified and formulated, these strategies being to formulate a strategic plan, encourage technological innovation, build a sustainable construction workforce, and improve effective construction management. The measures and strategies form a diamond-shaped framework for systemic construction industry TFP enhancement. The measures under each strategy were illustrated by a causal loop diagram in the framework, indicating that the strategies should be adopted systematically for maximized synergies. The study contributes to the literature with its novel mixed-methods design that provides measurable evidence for developing a systemic construction TFP enhancement framework that supports industry stakeholders in effectively formulating and implementing the CPES.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction productivity enhancement; influencing parameter; system thinking; total factor productivity |
| Index terms: | strategy, face, total factor productivity, sustainable construction, evidence, productivity, construction cost, Hong Kong, implementation, construction industry, construction productivity, synergy, labour shortage, technological innovation |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, production economics, psychology, operations management, contractual arrangements, innovation and technology management, financial and cost management, management, economics, Geography, sustainable construction, partnership management, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Supply Chain Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here