Zhang, J; Xiang, P; Zhang, R; Chen, D and Ren, Y (2020) Mediating effect of risk propensity between personality traits and unsafe behavioral intention of construction workers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(4): 04020023, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The construction industry has the highest number of casualties per accident, and workers at construction sites are vulnerable to accidents. Current research on unsafe behavior mainly focuses on behavior-based safety at the individual level and safety culture at the organization level; these two safety management rubrics enjoy respective advantages and are essentially complementary. This study takes a psychological approach and examines how personality traits affect unsafe behavior of construction workers. Based on the Big Five personality model and the theory of planned behavior, it is postulated that risk propensity mediates the relationships between personality traits and unsafe behavioral intention of construction workers. Structural equation modeling and bootstrapping techniques were used to analyze data collected from 533 construction workers in China. Results show that (1) personality traits, risk propensity, and unsafe behavioral intention of construction workers are related to each other; and (2) risk propensity plays a partial mediating role on the relationships between personality traits (extraversion, openness to experience, and conscientiousness) and unsafe behavioral intention. The findings provide a deeper understanding of how the perceptions of construction workers affect their behaviors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | big five personality traits; construction workers; risk propensity; unsafe behavioral intention |
| Index terms: | construction worker, construction industry, planned behaviour, personality, safety culture, safety management, China, structural equation modelling, construction site, risk propensity, unsafe behaviour |
| Subjects: | work location, practitioner, industry analysis, behavioral psychology, statistical analysis, occupational health and safety management, Geography, health safety and environment, financial risk, decision-making and reasoning |
| Topics: | Site Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here