Zhang, R P; Lingard, H and Oswald, D (2020) Impact of supervisory safety communication on safety climate and behavior in construction workgroups. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(8): 0001881, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In industries in which organizations work in decentralized and distributed structures such as construction, workers are more likely to be influenced by their workgroup supervisors than upper-level management. A study was conducted to quantitatively examine the relationships among supervisory safety communication, group safety climate, and safety behaviors, as well as to qualitatively explore effective ways for supervisors to communicate safety expectations and information to workers. A survey was conducted among workers engaged in rail construction work in Melbourne, Australia. Survey data were collected from 20 workgroups across 11 different worksites. Participant observation was also performed on these worksites to observe safety-related interactions and communication between supervisors and workers. The quantitative research results show that supervisory safety communication practices play a critical role in shaping safety climate within workgroups, which subsequently affects workers' self-reported safety compliance and safety participation behaviors. The on-site participant observations identified various characteristics of effective safety communication between supervisors and coworkers, including regular engagement, consistent messages and actions, active listening, approachability, personal messages, and respectful delivery. The research results provide important practical implications for construction organizations to dedicate resources to developing supervisors' leadership capabilities and personal skills, which could contribute to improved safety communication and safety performance in the workplace.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; safety climate; safety communication; supervisor; workgroup |
| Index terms: | Australia, safety behaviour, quantitative research, construction organization, interaction, supervisor, construction work, survey, safety climate, compliance, observation, safety performance |
| Subjects: | Geography, health safety and environment, occupational health and safety management, behavioral psychology, data collection methods, organization, practitioner, operations management, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here