Zhang, X; Zhang, W; Jiang, L and Zhao, T (2020) Identification of critical causes of tower-crane accidents through system thinking and case analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(7): 04020071, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Tower-crane accidents occur frequently and often have serious consequences. To identify the critical causes of tower-crane accidents, this study adopted a method that combined system thinking and case analysis. The entirety of tower-crane accident causes was considered as a system, and was divided into six subsystems and 34 causal factors. Information was collected on 141 investigation reports of tower-crane accidents in China from 2013 to 2018. The occurrence frequencies of accident causal factors and situation severities of subsystems were statistically analyzed. A combination of order relationship analysis and decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory methods was used to quantitatively evaluate the correlations among different causal factors, and the results of a comprehensive centrality and causality of 34 causal factors were obtained. Critical causes of tower-crane accidents were identified, including workers' wrong actions, inadequate safety training, inadequate safety inspection, low safety awareness, and safety engineer's mismanagement. To verify the practicability of the system model and identified critical causes, a case study of a typical serious tower-crane accident was conducted. Finally, corresponding recommendations are proposed for tower-crane safety management improvement and accident prevention.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accident cause; case study; DEMATEL; order relationship analysis; system thinking; tower crane |
| Index terms: | case study, safety management, engineer, tower crane, China, decision-making, investigation, safety inspection, laboratory, safety training, accident prevention |
| Subjects: | maintenance engineering, Geography, decision analysis, data collection methods, occupational health and safety management, profession, quality assurance, research management, environmental health |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Sustainability, Research Practice, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here