Ali, G M; Kosa, J; Bouferguene, A and Al-Hussein, M (2021) Competitive assessment of ice and frozen silt mat for crane ground support using finite-element analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(6): 04021038, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
High capacity cranes are the backbone of the heavy construction industry, which, over the last few years, has embraced modularization. Consequently, ground stability has become a critical issue for their safe utilization. In practice, ground stability includes laying several thicknesses of adequately compacted construction aggregates and one or more layers of timber/steel mats on top. In the present study, a novel alternative is explored whereby an artificially created layer of ice or frozen silt constitutes the base upon which timber or steel mats can be stacked for ancillary crane support. However, to understand the challenges and feasibility of the proposed technology, a theoretical study using finite-element analysis (FEA) is carried out in order to gain insight into the factors that can affect the structural behavior of ice/frozen silt and their comparison with commonly used mat materials, timber (Coastal Douglas fir), and steel (G40.21-44W). The comparison is built using mechanical properties under identical boundary conditions. The results show that the performance of frozen silt is on par with that of Coastal Douglas fir. A preliminary cost comparison is also established to develop the value proposition of using frozen silt as a crane mat.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | crane mats; crawler crane; finite-element analysis; frozen silt; ground bearing pressure; hydraulic crane; ice |
| Index terms: | heavy construction, modularization, stability, thickness, aggregate, hydraulic, boundary condition, critical issue, mechanical property |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, risk assessment, material properties and characteristics, building construction, materials science, infrastructure and transport systems, fluid mechanics |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Risk Management, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here